Comments for Kakistocrat http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:06:23 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Mary Ever-Virgin by Errors Revisited « Kakistokrat http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/mary-ever-virgin/#comment-150 Errors Revisited « Kakistokrat Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:06:23 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-150 [...] Lifetime Virginity.” He had initially shown some interest in conversing about it, so I wrote a response inviting his feedback. None came but a short time later I was made aware, that someone named [...] [...] Lifetime Virginity.” He had initially shown some interest in conversing about it, so I wrote a response inviting his feedback. None came but a short time later I was made aware, that someone named [...]

]]> Comment on Why McCain will Win by Catholicxvi http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/why-mccain-will-win/#comment-149 Catholicxvi Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:00:17 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-149 I am going to have to prescribe this document written by my father on the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' document called "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship". This document tells us that their is a specific way we must vote. It does not endorse any person nor any party. It simply specifies how to vote while staying in good conditions with the Church. That means that if you purposely vote a different way (knowing it is wrong), you are sinning. Over 100 bishops have made statements similar to what my father has to say in this document. Please read it by going to the site listed below. http://catholicxvi.stblogs.com/2008/12/29/catholic-voting-clarification-on-page-15/ I am going to have to prescribe this document written by my father on the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ document called “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship”. This document tells us that their is a specific way we must vote. It does not endorse any person nor any party. It simply specifies how to vote while staying in good conditions with the Church. That means that if you purposely vote a different way (knowing it is wrong), you are sinning.

Over 100 bishops have made statements similar to what my father has to say in this document. Please read it by going to the site listed below.

http://catholicxvi.stblogs.com/2008/12/29/catholic-voting-clarification-on-page-15/

]]> Comment on Morgentaler’s No Hero by Jean Vanier & The Order of Canada « Kakistokrat http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/morgentalers-no-hero-2/#comment-148 Jean Vanier & The Order of Canada « Kakistokrat Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:24:47 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=7#comment-148 [...] the appointment of abortionist Henry Morgentaler to the Order of Canada (you can read about it here), a dozen or so well known Canadian Catholics, have returned the Award that was previously given [...] [...] the appointment of abortionist Henry Morgentaler to the Order of Canada (you can read about it here), a dozen or so well known Canadian Catholics, have returned the Award that was previously given [...]

]]> Comment on Why McCain will Win by Zultan http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/why-mccain-will-win/#comment-147 Zultan Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:40:47 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-147 hmm. hmm.

]]> Comment on Mary Ever-Virgin by Perpetual Virginity: I have a Critic « Kakistokrat http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/mary-ever-virgin/#comment-146 Perpetual Virginity: I have a Critic « Kakistokrat Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:28:09 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-146 [...] for it or against (his original article may be read here, while my response has been re-posted here). A short time later, my rebuttal was deconstructed by a fellow blogger, who, so far as I can tell, [...] [...] for it or against (his original article may be read here, while my response has been re-posted here). A short time later, my rebuttal was deconstructed by a fellow blogger, who, so far as I can tell, [...]

]]> Comment on Why McCain will Win by Obama/McCain 2008 « Kakistokrat http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/why-mccain-will-win/#comment-145 Obama/McCain 2008 « Kakistokrat Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:35:50 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-145 [...] and instead will focus on the United States. My own prediction back in January, and then again in August, that McCain would win the Presidency, appears to be in jeopordy. We can discuss the mathematics of [...] [...] and instead will focus on the United States. My own prediction back in January, and then again in August, that McCain would win the Presidency, appears to be in jeopordy. We can discuss the mathematics of [...]

]]> Comment on Why McCain will Win by Colleen http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/why-mccain-will-win/#comment-137 Colleen Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:37:55 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-137 "I suppose I would be more surprised than offended if an American sought to comment on Canadian politics. :)" I have nothing to add to a discussion on politics but this sentance made me smile.:) “I suppose I would be more surprised than offended if an American sought to comment on Canadian politics. :) ”

I have nothing to add to a discussion on politics but this sentance made me smile.:)

]]> Comment on Why McCain will Win by K. http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/why-mccain-will-win/#comment-136 K. Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:35:19 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-136 I suppose I would be more surprised than offended if an American sought to comment on Canadian politics. :) Two developments today. -Indiana, one of those three states yesterday spoken of as being a Democratic pick up from the Republicans is now back in Republican hands -McCain finds himself a point behind Obama in the electorally insignificant Democratic state of New Hampshire So now Obama only has two Republican pick ups (11 total electoral votes I believe), and that is not good enough electorally. Add that to what Kerry won in 2004, that would put him just below 270 and McCain a little above. Considering that one needs 270 electoral votes, if the election were held today, Obama would lose. I suppose I would be more surprised than offended if an American sought to comment on Canadian politics. :)

Two developments today.

-Indiana, one of those three states yesterday spoken of as being a Democratic pick up from the Republicans is now back in Republican hands

-McCain finds himself a point behind Obama in the electorally insignificant Democratic state of New Hampshire

So now Obama only has two Republican pick ups (11 total electoral votes I believe), and that is not good enough electorally. Add that to what Kerry won in 2004, that would put him just below 270 and McCain a little above. Considering that one needs 270 electoral votes, if the election were held today, Obama would lose.

]]> Comment on Why McCain will Win by Agellius http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/why-mccain-will-win/#comment-135 Agellius Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:59:09 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=65#comment-135 First of all, I don't consider it any intrusion for you to comment on American politics. (Would Canadians consider it intrusive of Americans to comment on Canadian politics?) Second, you've made my day. It's my general practice to ignore the news. After a couple decades of following it more or less daily, I eventually reached the point where I realized it was doing me more harm than good. It was making me mad a lot of the time, and when I wasn't mad I was worried. Yet none of that anger or worry had made a lick of difference over the years, as far as I could tell. So I decided to quit worrying and being mad. But I still catch glimpses of the news, and frankly I was worried about an Obama presidency. So I'm greatly relieved to read your analysis. I'm not in a position to critique it objectively and say whether or not it holds water, but it does make sense to me and therefore I'm feeling more hopeful than I have in a while. So thanks! First of all, I don’t consider it any intrusion for you to comment on American politics. (Would Canadians consider it intrusive of Americans to comment on Canadian politics?)

Second, you’ve made my day. It’s my general practice to ignore the news. After a couple decades of following it more or less daily, I eventually reached the point where I realized it was doing me more harm than good. It was making me mad a lot of the time, and when I wasn’t mad I was worried. Yet none of that anger or worry had made a lick of difference over the years, as far as I could tell. So I decided to quit worrying and being mad.

But I still catch glimpses of the news, and frankly I was worried about an Obama presidency. So I’m greatly relieved to read your analysis. I’m not in a position to critique it objectively and say whether or not it holds water, but it does make sense to me and therefore I’m feeling more hopeful than I have in a while.

So thanks!

]]> Comment on Obama’s VP Nominee? by Agellius http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/obamas-vp-nominee/#comment-131 Agellius Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:57:11 +0000 http://mrkellywilson.wordpress.com/?p=48#comment-131 I'm glad to hear you think so and I look forward to finding out your reasons. I’m glad to hear you think so and I look forward to finding out your reasons.

]]>